Whatever. There is a point where I can tell them, prove you own the rights. The only way to properly prove it is to prove with written and signed documents of every single transfer of copyright agreement leading from the original Commodore corporation to Cloanto. Every transfer of copyright ownership MUST be accounted for. Without it, it's statutorily invalid. > > On September 1, 2017 at 1:34 AM smf <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > On 31/08/2017 19:18, email@example.com > firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > > > > > > They would have to still have a sufficient claims for damages for the > > case to move forward from just being filed. > > > > > > There is at least some effort to fix such a stupid limitation in the > court system. > > https://artlawjournal.com/copyright-small-claims-court/ > > On 31/08/2017 19:18, email@example.com > firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > > > > > > When it turns to criminal case, the copyright holder filing the > > lawsuit has the burden of proof. > > > > > > Surely a criminal case is filed by a federal prosecutor? They would only > need to prove that you aren't the copyright holder, in the case of the > commodore roms then there is compelling evidence that it's cloanto that > owns them and none for you owning them. The FBI could seize your > computers looking for any electronic communications where you admit that > you weren't the copyright holder. > > There are some pretty serious requirements that you'd need to meet > before the case would be criminal though. It would normally only be > something like a large scale counterfeiting operation. > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-09-01 13:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.