On Sun, Aug 20, 2017 at 8:17 AM, smf <email@example.com> wrote: > On 20/08/2017 09:59, didier derny wrote: >> >> this board: http://www.codesrc.com/mediawiki/index.php?title=SCSI2SD may >> work too Reading up on it, the SCSI2SD appears to now support internally mapping ID 0 LUN 1 as ID 1, so that part might be OK. > However like all good standards people ignore the details of the > specification & implement their device to work with other peoples > implementations. One thing that's different about the D9060/D9090 vs "modern" machines, is block size. 256 bytes per block, not 512. Any new SCSI/SASI device would have to support, at least in some fashion, the low-level formatting routines (or at least respond in such a way that the ROM header command would still work. There's no need to really low-level format, of course, so it's likely that just a "N0:DISKNAME" and not a "N0:DISKNAME,ID" would work. The block size still has to work, of course and few modern devices deal with physical blocks under 512 bytes. That might take some additional mods to SCSI2SD beyond the LUN mapper fix. -ethan Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-08-20 20:00:02
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.