Re: The Ultimate-64

From: Jim Brain <brain_at_jbrain.com>
Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2017 12:32:15 -0500
Message-ID: <6c67bbb8-e241-cb28-b9bb-e4d47111dcac@jbrain.com>
On 7/17/2017 11:19 AM, smf wrote:
> On 17/07/2017 16:34, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote:
>
>> I understand his choice and this was one of the things I also 
>> suggested. This is a compromise.
>
> I get that, but I'm still disappointed.
Do you (or any of you on the list) understand how absolutely devastating 
that viewpoint is to those who consider building solutions for the platform?

I realize everyone is entitled to an opinion, and this list should 
discuss the merits of such an omission as part of normal discourse, but 
the implications of making such blanket statements are far-reaching.  It 
certainly doesn't foster community spirit.

>
> I might be wrong but I'm assuming it's the unpopulated 2 rows of 12 
> pins between the keyboard and the cartridge port. If so then it's not 
> the best compromise.
How would you have compromised?

Jim
-- 

Jim Brain
brain@jbrain.com
www.jbrain.com


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2017-07-17 18:00:12

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.