Re: NTSC VIC-II timing

From: Spiro Trikaliotis <ml-cbmhackers_at_trikaliotis.net>
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2017 18:37:51 +0200
Message-ID: <20170621163751.GC1730@hermes.local.trikaliotis.net>
Hello,

* On Wed, Jun 21, 2017 at 06:35:24PM +0200 silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote:
 
> I understand (and know, in fact). But it seems I wasn't entirely
> clear. The sentence should be read as: "I can't envision [myself
> writing] a commercial product (game f.e.) that would just break
> because the machine has a different but still valid VIC chip inside".
> Not that I am writing one now ;-) but the old habits never die...

But now, we know of all these variants, so we can take them into
account. Back in the days, I suspect most people did not know about
these differences.

Regards,
Spiro.

-- 
Spiro R. Trikaliotis
http://www.trikaliotis.net/

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2017-06-21 17:05:59

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.