Re: trying to identify a rom...

From: Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit_at_laosinh.s.bawue.de>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2017 21:45:30 +0200
Message-ID: <1fac6400-34c1-f696-9682-0810aee83d22@laosinh.s.bawue.de>
On 05/18/2017 09:34 PM, didier derny wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> 
> I tried to read it as a 2532  I get 2k of FF and 2k of real code 
> (visibly 6502 opcodes)
> 
> but I tought it was a 4k eprom

It could still be a 4K (EP)ROM, but it could also mean that only half of 
it is used. Unprogrammed EPROM cells read as FF.


  Gerrit





> 
> 
> On 18/05/2017 21:21, Francesco Messineo wrote:
>> If it was on a PET, it's either readable as 2532 or (much less 
>> probable) a 2716.
>> Frank
>>
>> On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 8:56 PM, didier derny <didier@aida.org> wrote:
>>> there are no other marking on the top
>>>
>>> on the bottom there is a number: 41203  made with some ink
>>>
>>> I know roughly what is in this eprom but I'm not sure about the 
>>> machine nor
>>> the rom type
>>>
>>> its a basic extension  but never seen this version 2.0 is probably the
>>> version of the basic with which it was used
>>>
>>>
>>> On 17/05/2017 22:21, Francesco Messineo wrote:
>>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 10:16 PM, didier derny <didier@aida.org> wrote:
>>>>> I'm trying to identifiy an eprom type to try to read it
>>>>>
>>>>> the rom is made by mos technology
>>>>>
>>>>> 24 pin
>>>>>
>>>>> datecode: 3680   (the 4000/8000 were not  sold at this time ?)
>>>>>
>>>>> label:  Edex 2.0
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> my wild guess is to say it was for the commodore 3000  not found the
>>>>> schematics I guess it's equivalent to 2001N
>>>>>
>>>>> on the schematics  I found rom  6332  any datasheet any where ?
>>>>>
>>>>> what differences between a 2332 and a 6332  ?
>>>>
>>>> I've never heard about 6332. 2332 is the classic 4k ROM, pin
>>>> compatible with 2532 EPROM type (NOT 2732).
>>>> Is there anything else under the label? There must be a part number 
>>>> too.
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Frank IZ8DWF
>>>>
>>>>          Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>>
>>>
>>>        Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>>         Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
> 
> 
>        Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
> 
> 


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2017-05-18 20:02:44

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.