On 20/02/2017 14:33, Justin Cordesman wrote: > I agree that the issue with that old article is clearly that it is describing behavior of the scaler and quantization of the signals coming out of the 64 and cannot be relied on to describe the behavior of different revisions. If putting it through a scaler makes display noise more visible that is usually hidden with a combination of your crt, your eyes and your brain then it is perfectly valid to use that to determine which revision is better than any other. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-02-20 16:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.