Re: Luma discussions

From: Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 20 Feb 2017 15:11:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CAFqpYu6fVOaUGvSZpHOaqH_La=xMJB_SW6BjG0rznmtMLJ0oPg@mail.gmail.com>
Well i tried to reduce noise in another thread :-D

Sadly i'm not good at magic so the noise just turned up somewhere else :-/

2017-02-20 15:09 GMT+01:00 <silverdr@wfmh.org.pl>:

> While you certainly added noise, I believe you forgot to add any signal to
> those reposted messages, didn't you?
>
> > On 2017-02-20, at 13:34, Bo Herrmannsen <bo.herrmannsen@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > 2017-02-20 13:32 GMT+01:00 smf <smf@null.net>:
> > On 20/02/2017 10:41, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote:
> > The "dust" he writes about applies to my understanding only to the
> "modern plasma TV" he used and which I expect does bad job handling off
> specs signals.
> >
> > Old tv's are blurry and uses anlogue processing. Plasma TV's have
> crisper pixels & depending on the TV and how it's setup could have less
> than 8 bits of colour resolution per channel. This makes irregularities in
> the video signal more visible, which is especially worse if the plasma TV
> has a much larger screen size.
> >
> > VCD and DVB suffer from the same problem as they were developed to be
> satisfactory with old tv's.
> >
> >
> >       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
> >
>
> --
> SD!
>
>
>        Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2017-02-20 15:01:36

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.