> On 2017-02-18, at 21:59, HÁRSFALVI Levente <email@example.com> wrote: > >> Not quite... You can get a clear picture from a 6569R1, 6569R3 or 6569R4 >> (that one is rather rare) as well. The problem on the older boards is >> mostly the modulator. Replace it with a simple video amp and you will >> have a very good picture. Ok, you lose the RF output, but who is using >> that anymore? > > There is clearly a visible difference between an R3 and an R5 on a 250466 board. (I've been using an R3 after having killed the original R5 of the machine / before I could obtain another one.) Could you elaborate/describe the difference? It's been some time since I tried those (and it was not in the '466 either) but I didn't notice anything striking. The R1 with its luma levels makes a noticeable difference but the later ones? -- SD! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-02-19 14:01:40
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.