On Friday 17 February 2017, 18:58:51 Gerrit Heitsch <gerrit@laosinh.s.bawue.de> wrote: > On 02/17/2017 06:28 PM, groepaz@gmx.net wrote: > > On Friday 17 February 2017, 17:21:44 smf <smf@null.net> wrote: > >> On 17/02/2017 11:58, Bo Herrmannsen wrote: > >>> i have also thought what it would require to make a chip that would work > >>> 100% like the original but have more modern outputs.. ie hdmi, or > >>> RGB.... > >>> you get my drift > >> > >> The hard part is making a chip that works 100% like the original. Once > >> you can output composite, then outputting rgb or hdmi should be easy. > > > > indeed, replacing the video output by whatever you want to use is trivial > > compared to the effort needed to make a proper replica of the video chip > > :) > > It's one thing to make a 100% replica of VIC as it is described in the > data sheet, but it's something else to make a replica that behaves 100% > like VIC, especially in the undocumented parts that people use to > achieve certain effects. of course, i wasn't talking about the datasheet at all :) making something that works according to the specs in the datasheet is easy =P -- http://www.hitmen-console.org http://magicdisk.untergrund.net http://www.pokefinder.org http://ar.pokefinder.org Ich bin nicht faul.... ich hab nur keine Lust. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2017-02-17 19:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.