Re: Pet basic-2 save different than C64?

From: William Levak <wlevak_at_SDF.ORG>
Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2017 17:22:10 +0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <Pine.NEB.4.64.1702101709060.29719@sdf.lonestar.org>
On Tue, 7 Feb 2017, Francesco Messineo wrote:

> the gold plating is scratched, but cleaning the contact made a good
> improvement so I won't apply tin on it for now. Both sides are
> connected together but the original C2N connector has contacts only on
> the top side (you wonder why Commodore did save even on this aspect!)
> and the contacts appear to be just tin plated or worse nickel plated.
> Next step (if I really want to throw away my time) is trying to align
> both my C2N to read reliably the same tapes. So far, tapes written by
> one appear empty on the other.

The original C2N had the contacts on the other side.  They are also not 
very reliable.  On some of our early C2Ns we replaced the connector with a 
standard card edge connector, and used a shell from a "D" connector. This 
gave us the equivalent of the connector that Commodore used on later tape 
drives.

There are adjusting screws on the head.  You need a commercially recorded 
tape and an oscilloscope to do the alignment.  Without these you can do it 
by trial and error. If can get a tape from someone, you can just adjust 
the head so that it reads that tape.

wlevak@sdf.lonestar.org
SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2017-02-10 18:00:02

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.