> On 2016-10-13, at 20:12, smf <email@example.com> wrote: > > On 13/10/2016 18:38, Jim Brain wrote: >> But, it was very common in the early 70's. Lots of stuff was .156" > > It's common now as well, I'd be interested in the history of that. It's probably boring, like someone used it for some random reason then everyone copied it. It would also be interesting to know if it's really .156" or this comes from something like .1556847636 rounded to "reasonable" precision? -- SD! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2016-10-13 19:00:58
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.