Re: MAX Machine PLA

From: smf <smf_at_null.net>
Date: Wed, 3 Aug 2016 07:55:18 +0100
Message-ID: <8a97dabd-5642-859e-ff31-cbb3e8b7143c@null.net> 
On 03/08/2016 01:36, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> The whole doc is about VIC-II, so no, I don't think so.  Not that this
> doc explains where it got that information.

My guess is that they mistook the VIC-I and VIC-II. It was common back 
in the day to talk about the VIC chip in the c64.


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2016-08-03 07:00:02

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.