> On 2016-04-18, at 12:42, Baltissen, GJPAA (Ruud) <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > Hallo Patryk, > > >> My personal one: the old one was quite "dusty". The new one is far less dusty but still far from being polished to current standards. > > Please, please, feel free to explain what could be done better, especially the "dusty" thing.. I won't feel hurt or offended in any way. It's rather OT here. Generally it's also related to what you wrote below about the screen sizes. While the new one looks much more fresh (the original one was like straight from the early nineties when patterned bacgkrounds, rotating gifanims or jumping arrows and first JS statusbar scrolls ruled the web :-) the important part these days is to adapt to various screen sizes and various browsers gracefully. It's not only about the line length. It's about making sure that things don't line break when they shouldn't or when they do that they don't break the layout, etc. I guess we can continue off the list if you like. -- SD! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2016-04-19 19:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.