> On 2016-03-29, at 23:25, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > > On Tuesday 29 March 2016, 23:18:06 email@example.com wrote: >>> On 2016-03-29, at 23:06, Justin <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >>>>> Compared to Jiffy-Dos V6 is the speed any faster, >>>> >>>> Substantially. >>> >>> https://www.c64-wiki.com/index.php/Comparison_of_fast_loaders >> >> I don't think the values at the bottom are correct though. That's why I look >> for that 64er speed test or whatever it was called. > > beware! that program doesnt init the TOD correctly, so the 50/60Hz bit is at > 60Hz on PAL - and the values (including those in the wiki) come out wrong I see - but it shouldn't be /that/ much off as it seems to be, if it was only the TOD difference. I don't feel like writing the whole speed test suite myself - I guess fixing the TOD initialisation in that PRG should be easier ;-) -- SD! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2016-03-29 23:00:02
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.