Re: Commodore 65 and DIN8 cable

Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2016 20:55:53 +0100
Message-Id: <>
> On 2016-03-03, at 18:51, Bo Zimmerman <> wrote:
> On 3/3/2016 7:26 AM, wrote:
>>> On 2016-03-03, at 14:13, Michał Pleban <> wrote:
>>> so that it would drive the line stronger. But it would require modifying
>>> the drive, and still it doesn't explain why Bo's computer works.
>> Is Bo's U1 of the very same revision as yours?
> I'm not sure what U1 is,

There are two problems with the above - first I was looking at the wrong page of the schematics - so the above should read U3 rather than U1, be then this doesn't seem to be valid either as U3 on your board is a small PAL chip rather than the FDC in question. That's why I put a "valid" qualifier before the "schematics" in my first post referring to the schematics. I /guess/ it's the U22 on your board.


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2016-03-03 20:00:11

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.