> On 2016-03-03, at 18:51, Bo Zimmerman <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > > On 3/3/2016 7:26 AM, email@example.com wrote: >>> On 2016-03-03, at 14:13, Michał Pleban <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: >>> >>> so that it would drive the line stronger. But it would require modifying >>> the drive, and still it doesn't explain why Bo's computer works. >> Is Bo's U1 of the very same revision as yours? >> > I'm not sure what U1 is, There are two problems with the above - first I was looking at the wrong page of the schematics - so the above should read U3 rather than U1, be then this doesn't seem to be valid either as U3 on your board is a small PAL chip rather than the FDC in question. That's why I put a "valid" qualifier before the "schematics" in my first post referring to the schematics. I /guess/ it's the U22 on your board. -- SD! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2016-03-03 20:00:11
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.