Re: What is the most used ROM in the brown 1541?

From: silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl
Date: Thu, 18 Jun 2015 18:46:29 +0000
Message-ID: <48A798FB-8675-437A-B8AC-1BBE101A44F2@wfmh.org.pl>
Digging biological memory now. AFAIR the incompatibility you refer to was mentioned in the context of writing the disk formatted with 4040, using 1541 (or the other way around :-) There should be no problem exchanging the disks for read only purposes. I need to check this in my files later. But the authors got something  important wrong too. One of them insisted for a long time, even after the incdos book was published, that save and replace bug was a myth. 
-- 
Sent from mobile device. Please have understanding. 

On 18 June 2015 20:11:06 CEST, Ruud@Baltissen.org wrote:
>Hallo Julian and everyone else,
>
>
>> I wonder just what your reason for the question is....
>
>First a remark on forehand: quite some I time ago I read "Inside 
>Commodore DOS" and that book mentioned that you couldn't exchange 
>floppies between a 1541 and a 4040. I never had problems with 
>exchanging floppy disks between the brown 1541, 1541C, 1541-II and 
>CBM 4040.
>
>I'm still busy with commenting the sources of the various ROMs and I 
>noticed that in version 901229-03 the number of bytes in the header 
>gap was increased from 8 to 9. This meant that 9 is also the value 
>used in 901229-05, -06AA and the 1541-II. And this is the value that 
>was already present in the CBM 4040. 
>
>So it seems it was changed to 8 for the 1540 for one or another 
>reasons. I have a 1540 but, to be honest, I never used it for 
>programming, testing etc., etc.: I considered it too much as an 
>collectors item. The rest of my 1541s have all been equiped with the 
>05, even the older long-boards (not done by me). And I wanted to 
>know if this was a coincidense or was the 05 more wide spread than 
>anything else.
>
>Except changing the checksum, changing the size of the header gap at 
>two places was the only change of version 03. And these 9 bytes 
>triggered me to remember the book. And as said before, I never had 
>any, any problem at all so I thought the author must have it wrong 
>in one or another way. But what?
>It now seems that the author must have been testing using a 01 or 02 
>version.
>
>After remark: this afternoon I got the idea to check my spare 
>storage and that gave me another conformation of what is the most 
>used ROM inside the 1541: I _only_ have 901229-05s ! 
>
>
>--
>   
>Kind regards / Met vriendelijke groet, Ruud Baltissen
>www.Baltissen.org
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2015-06-18 19:01:38

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.