I agree. mutt is really only useful in a modern terminal or VT100, not something like a CBM 256-80. Use mailx. b On Sat, Jan 3, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Marko Mäkelä <msmakela@gmail.com> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 02, 2015 at 10:19:27AM -0500, william degnan wrote: > >> No web browser, just command line things. >> > > I would not classify mutt as a command-line program. I would associate the > command-line with something that would work with a line-oriented terminal, > such as a teletype. > > If you want a command-line setup, then BSD mailx and ed should do the job. > I am not aware of any command-line web browser. > > If you want textual user interface (TUI) that works with a display > terminal such as the Digital VT100, then I do not see why elinks would be > any different from mutt, vi, or emacs. It is just like lynx that I used to > use some 20 years ago, but supports some HTML features better. > > For interfacing elinks with mutt, I have the following in my .muttrc: > > auto_view text/html > > In .mailcap, I have two lines that control mutt: > > text/html; elinks -eval "set document.codepage.assume = %{charset}" > %s; nametemplate=%s.html > text/html; elinks -dump -eval "set document.codepage.assume = > %{charset}" %s; nametemplate=%s.html; copiousoutput > > The first one is for interactive display (for example, if I want to follow > the hyperlinks), and the second one is for viewing the HTML as text in the > built-in viewer of mutt. > > > Marko > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2015-01-04 19:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.