On Thu, 11 Dec 2014, William Levak wrote: > On Wed, 10 Dec 2014, Martin Hoffmann-Vetter wrote: > >> Hello William, >> >>> I have list the -02 and -06 ROMs as revisons 1a and 2a because the are >>> almost identical to revisons 1 and 2, and because Commodore didn't >>> think they were significant enough to release world wide. >> >>> ROMs Revision >>> 325302-01, 901229-01 r0 >>> 325302-01, 901229-02 r1a Japan >>> 325302-01, 901229-03 r1 >>> 325302-01, 901229-05 r2 >>> 325302-01, 901229-06 r2a Europe >> >> I think it's known that the revision part of the part number is chronology. >> So the question is, why is p/n 901229-06 with revision 2a after revision 2 >> with p/n 901229-05 when p/n 901229-02 with revision 1a is before revision 1 >> with p/n 901229-03? > > Because there are only three bytes different between r1a and r1. That is, > r1a is closest to r1. If you want it to be strictly chronological, then it > should be r0z and r1. If you don't like those suggestions, how about calling it r1 beta. wlevak@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2014-12-27 05:00:49
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.