On Wednesday 03 December 2014, 23:56:58 Kajtár Zsolt <email@example.com> wrote: > > I understand your reasons completely but.... My own assembler behaved > > exactly as you mentioned. And I noticed it wasn't conveniant. Then I > > noticed that other assemblers, in particular, behaved in the "wrong" but > > more conveniant way. So why couldn't mine? So I altered it and never ever > > regretted it. > > > > You noticed you haven convinced me. But you can probably by giving me a > > good example where things can go wrong very badly by mixing bytes, > > strings and characters after the .byte directive. > > There's no one true way ;) I didn't tried to convenience you, just explained > that it works differently then you expected, and why. > > >> .text "enD" > > > > One remark: what about the BASIC operators in the source codes i.e. > > '+'+$80, '-'+$80 etc.? IMHO it seems this construction is still needed. > > In other words: take the best of two worlds :) > > '+'+$80 and similar stuff works of course. Ok? isnt the real mistake here that +$80 is used, instead of the more correct |$80 ? :) -- http://www.hitmen-console.org http://magicdisk.untergrund.net http://www.pokefinder.org http://ar.pokefinder.org One can not seriously make jokes about apple. But their customers are a different story. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2014-12-04 00:01:08
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.