On Dec 2, 2014, at 2:05 PM, Segher Boessenkool <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 02, 2014 at 12:04:46PM -0800, Nate Lawson wrote: >> I was thinking the patent dispute was more about the NMOS process in general. Did Motorola have general silicon production patents that they could have used against MOS? > > That could be. I have never seen silicon process patents from Motorola, > but then again, I haven't looked. > >> In fact, are the lawsuit filings public and archived somewhere visible? > > No idea, never seen it. The settlement would be a lot more interesting > but that is almost certainly not public. There is some excellent detective work here. The wikipedia page for the 6800 isnít bad either. http://www.swtpc.com/mholley/Microprocessors/Microprocessor_History.htm -Nate Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2014-12-03 00:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.