On Sat, 17 May 2014, Martin Hoffmann-Vetter wrote: >> What about 2.6? > > > This is the DOS for the single cpu version 2031/1541/1551. This is a 170 kb > disk format (see DOS 2.1), based on DOS 2.5. > >> The double sided format is DOS 2.7. > > This was designed later. It support super side blocks for large relative > files. > >> Was there >> something in between, or did they leave an extra number in case it >> would be needed? > > They need and used this version number. It's in the right chonology > sequence. The chronology may be right, but the functionality isn't. Logically DOS 2.6 should have been 2.2. wlevak@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2014-05-23 10:03:18
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.