Re: Rhialto, Why...

From: Clocky <*clockmeister_at_internode.on.net*> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2014 10:00:08 +0800 Message-ID: <000c01cf60f3$411490e0$6501a8c0@GerardusPC> · clockmeister_at_internode.on.net

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "MikeS" <dm561@torfree.net>
To: <cbm-hackers@musoftware.de>
Sent: Saturday, April 26, 2014 9:49 AM
Subject: Re: Rhialto, Why...

> No, actually it's Justin who thinks his messages are so important and
> confidential that they merit encryption and the 8K that needlessly adds to 
> a
> 1K message.
>
> Rhialto's needless attachments only add 4KB; of course as usual when 
> people
> have an issue with *one* person's email the answer to anyone asking about 
> it
> is to denigrate and suggest replacing the email client that works just 
> fine
> with every other email, regardless of what that involves and how it 
> affects
> other emails.
>
> I think I'll pass and keep using mine; if I'm sufficiently annoyed, even
> antique OE has filters...
>

I've just installed OE Windows 7 version... and loving it.

Bah humbug to Seamonkey and Thunderbird.

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list