On 2/25/2014 1:28 PM, email@example.com wrote: > Exactly - I called it āmagic sequenceā but itās the same idea. And if > done well, it should be ārobust enoughā to prevent accidental > triggering. āCannot" is rather incorrect but the chances are > negligible. [ā¦] I left the detail off the original question since I felt people would quickly jump to "how can we enable such things" and wouldn't answer the original question, which is: "is there anything worth the effort?" > I very much like this approach. The only drawback is that the > switching code has to be relatively lengthy and placed properly before > running it. I dunno, emulating SPI in asm doesn't sound like too much work. On your second point, I would make it a requirement that each othhr mode would have something unique that could be checked right after the mode switch. Jim -- Jim Brain firstname.lastname@example.org www.jbrain.com Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2014-02-26 03:00:07
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.