Re: Wanted: a faster protocol for IEEE devices

From: Michał Pleban <>
Date: Wed, 18 Sep 2013 11:56:52 +0200
Message-ID: <> wrote:

> We have to read the pre-existing disks, hence we have no influence on the interleave. But it doesn't matter much anyway. If one keeps the table of processed sectors, the lookup is fast enough to read whatever comes at a given moment. 

I meant read interleave - in a situation when you simply instruct the
software to read consecutive sectors and download them. You can set this
parameter in cbmlink for example.

If you read whatever comes at the moment, then of course this does not
make sense. But this requires writing special software :-)


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2013-09-18 10:03:15

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.