Re: 6510FPGA Suggestions?

From: Ed Spittles <ed.spittles_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Aug 2013 19:08:12 +0100
Message-ID: <CAMPG4Y_rmDEpnGeeaFxz+cZaQptR=KhRpeb85KhbhfudwMiNBg@mail.gmail.com>
I can't say if the XIlinx tools are more or less usable than Altera's
tools, but I can say that I've found the Xilinx tools usable, reliable and
fast enough.  You get a simulator as well as a synthesiser, which means you
can get the tools, do a design, and check it, without spending any money.
 If you really didn't like the tools you could of course check out some
different ones.

The Godil products are a big reason why I've found myself taking the Xilinx
route.


On 25 August 2013 00:19, <silverdr@wfmh.org.pl> wrote:

> silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote:
>
> > How is the Xilinx software?
>
> On 2013-08-24, at 23:58, Mark McDougall wrote:
>
> > Xilinx software is absolute rubbish. Altera quartus is miles ahead
>
> On 2013-08-25, at 00:05, Bil Herd wrote:
>
> > I converted to Altera many years ago as I can produce much quicker and
> with
> > more reliability, at least with my style of designing.
>
> yeah.. hmm... nobody heard about something like the said GODIL but with
> Altera chips?
>
> --
> SD!
>
>
>        Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
>


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2013-08-25 19:00:12

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.