RE: 6510FPGA Suggestions?

From: Bil Herd <bherd_at_mercury-cg.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Aug 2013 18:05:37 -0400
Message-ID: <bd507a6348481e086e1011cdd3439010@mail.gmail.com>
I converted to Altera many years ago as I can produce much quicker and with
more reliability, at least with my style of designing.  I am also going to
be looking at the recent offerings w/ IGLOO2 and some other families as I am
thinking about making  multipurpose FPGA-40 or  FPGA-48 chip emulators.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-cbm-hackers@musoftware.de
[mailto:owner-cbm-hackers@musoftware.de] On Behalf Of Mark McDougall
Sent: Saturday, August 24, 2013 5:59 PM
To: cbm-hackers@musoftware.de
Subject: Re: 6510FPGA Suggestions?

Xilinx software is absolute rubbish. Altera quartus is miles ahead



Sent from my ASUS Pad

silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote:

>
>On 2013-08-24, at 09:56, Ed Spittles wrote:
>
>> There's a lot of relevant threads on forum.6502.org - search there for
>> FPGA.
>> Personally I seem to favour Xilinx, but there's a question of 5V
>> compatibility - everything is moving to 3V3.
>
>Unfortunately. I am aware that the application will have to have some kind
>of voltage/levels compatibility designed-in.
>
>How is the Xilinx software?
>
>--
>SD!
>
>
>       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
1�j
j˞ۮ���q�iɮɊX�X

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2013-08-24 23:00:46

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.