Re: Most used 6502 Assembler?

From: silverdr_at_wfmh.org.pl
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2013 22:32:06 +0200
Message-Id: <A2AEEFF1-6537-4240-8419-48238672D3E8@wfmh.org.pl>
On 2013-06-23, at 07:01, Richard wrote:

>> Note that SF and/or github might have problems with that source, as it
>> might not exactly fit their (or the) definition of open-source. ;)
> 
> I looked at github's terms of service and it doesn't say anything
> about the code you upload being open source.  I didn't see anything in
> bitbucket's terms of service either, but it was much longer and
> complicated and I confess I just searched for "open" instead of
> skimming the whole thing.

I think those are closest..

"You may not use the Service for any illegal or unauthorized purpose. You must not, in the use of the Service, violate any laws in your jurisdiction (including but not limited to copyright or trademark laws)."

"GitHub does not pre-screen Content, but GitHub and its designee have the right (but not the obligation) in their sole discretion to refuse or remove any Content that is available via the Service."

But it still doesn't say it has to be "open source".

-- 
SD!
       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2013-06-25 21:01:29

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.