On 6/10/2013 1:52 PM, Greg King wrote: > From: "A. Fachat"; on Sunday, June 09, 2013; at 10:25 AM -0400 >> >> - When you position to a record number that is not yet there, >> you get a "50, RECORD NOT PRESENT", as documented -- but, when >> you write to that, the file gets expanded "to that block". So, if you >> address a record that is _behind_ the one you wrote to, but is in >> the same disk block, it has already been created; and, you get an OK. > > From: "A. Fachat"; on Monday, June 10, 2013; at 6:41 AM -0400 >> >> Yes, you are correct, I forgot to mention that the file is filled UP >> to that block. > > You _did_ mention it! You said, "..., the file gets expanded to that > block". I suspect that Jim was confused because you wrote the word > "_behind_" instead of the word "_beyond_". > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list Most definitely. I read "behind" as "smaller than" I wonder if supporting that functionality is absolutely required for emulation. Jim -- Jim Brain brain@jbrain.com www.jbrain.com Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2013-06-11 15:00:04
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.