Re: Another DOS oddity...

From: A. Fachat <afachat_at_gmx.de>
Date: Sun, 09 Jun 2013 21:26:24 +0200
Message-ID: <4649422.mtccC42qgj@euler>
Sorry for answering this so late, but kmail chose to use a different "identity" 
so the mailing list was filtering it....

On Sunday 26 May 2013 23:32:46 you wrote:
> Am 26. Mai 2013 21:05:14 schrieb Jim Brain <brain@jbrain.com>:
> > On 5/26/2013 1:59 PM, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote:
> > > But, regarding the "correct" handling for B-A und B-F: Good to know. I
> > 
> > was not aware of that.
> > 
> > Yes, kudos to Greg for that.  I've seen the "U1 replaces..." piece in the
> > user manual for years, and have enjoyed ICD, and this was news to me.
> 
> Yes,  kudos indeed. I knew about the difference between b-r/w and u1/2 for
> a long time, but really wasn't aware of the b-a/f issue.

So, I modified the program to open the command channel, than open a direct file 
"#", do all the B-A and B-F, close the direct file then the command channel.
However, still the whole track is allocated, not just the few blocks that 
should be allocated.

So the error still persists.

André

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2013-06-09 20:00:03

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.