Re: BASIC and System ROM replacements

From: Jim Brain <>
Date: Mon, 27 May 2013 13:39:27 -0500
Message-ID: <>
On 5/26/2013 2:23 PM, Michał Pleban wrote:
> Hello!
> Jim Brain wrote:
>> Not to take away from the project, which I think is grand, but I was
>> looking for a more portable, self contained option.  Where the bank
>> select is *in* the same address space, and only reads are required to
>> select the bank.
> We already must handle writes to the ROM (to program the Flash chip from
> C64 side), so such option was never really investigated. What would be
> the exact advantages of it versus the current solution of taking some
> existing I/O space?
It's a more portable solution.  I'd like to expand options for VIC, +4, 
C128, etc., which have varied memory maps.
Fewer flying leads to connect, or PCB connection points, depending on 
the design.


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2013-05-27 19:00:06

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.