"A. Fachat" <email@example.com> schrieb: >My licensing preference would probably be lgpl (2) - if anyone uses it, >it >only helps spreading tbe use, but changes and improvements must be >shared. > >Just my 2cent > > > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list This seems to be a good choice. I will read it carefully and will try figure out any disadvantages for our purposes, if any. Anyone any other license suggestions? Pros? Cons? Everyone who contributes to this lib needs to accept the license, so we should find one which fits everyones needs as best as possible. Maybe a bsd license could be as good as lgpl for us. I will have a look. -- Message sent with K10-mail from android. Galaxy S2 GT-i9100 with 4.1.2 jelly bean and custom 3.1-kernel. stop Java and C++ - objects are communism!!! Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2013-04-27 22:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.