On Fri, 12 Apr 2013, silverdr@wfmh.org.pl wrote: > > On 2013-04-12, at 05:23, William Levak wrote: > >> Found the problem. The first file on the disk was a C4 file. When I loaded it, it loaded higher up in memory, where it didn't list. >> >> Both ":*" and "?*" produce the same result. > > Right. Both are (in slightly different ways) good to trigger skipping the DOS "*" part of code. > >> "0:?*" is only necessary if you got a file not found error, where the next load may try to load from the nonexistant drive 1. > > Wouldn't in such case a "0:*" still be sufficient? Since you have previously referenced a file, * now means last file referenced. wlevak@sdf.lonestar.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.lonestar.org Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2013-04-13 05:00:03
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.