I agree, all of mine failed also. Justin On Jul 30, 2012, at 19:10, raycomp <raycomp@visi.com> wrote: > I have repaired perhaps a dozen of the older C64's which have had the 82S100 chip (some of them had failed). > > --Ray > On Jul 29, 2012, at 1:43 PM, Marko Mäkelä wrote: > >> On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 06:48:19PM +0200, Gerrit Heitsch wrote: >>> The funny thing is... Did Commodore ever use the 82S100 in production C64 systems? So far I have only seen the 93459PC made by Fairchild in any of them. >> >> I seem to remember that my oldest C64 (serial number 34727) contains a 82S100. Can anyone confirm? >> >> Marko >> >> Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list > > -- > --------------------------------------------------------------- > |Raymond C. Bryan 651-642-9890 vox | The battle is sometimes | > |Raymond Computer 651-642-9891 fax | to the small for | > |2306 Robbins St. -email: raycomp | the bigger they are | > |St Paul MN 55114 _at_visi_dot_com | the harder they fall. | > |USA Amiga - Commodore | -- James Thurber -- | > http://www.raymondcomputer.com > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2012-07-31 01:00:15
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.