Hi Gerrit, On 05/26/2012 06:58 PM, Gerrit Heitsch wrote: > On 05/24/2012 09:30 PM, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: >> * On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 11:33:38AM -0700 Nate Lawson wrote: >> >>> Probably better to ask this on the opencbm-user list. >> >> Indeed. > > Hm, subscribing to a mailing list for a single question feels like > overkill to me. > >.... > > My approach worked without problems the last time I installed opencbm. > Well you've upgraded to ubuntu 12.04 in the meantime - and that have changed everything ;-) Anyway I've just posted this to the opencbm-user list - and as a special service for you I'm repeating it here :-) ===== Quote ON ====== Regarding OpenCBM libusb link-order problem: The problem is quite generic and it is pure luck that is hasn't occoured long time ago. The problem is (as always) related to binutils-ld. Obejct files that refer to library based functions should always be placed before the actual library on the commandline. This was not the case with OpenCBM. The binutils-ld linker have always been quite picky about placement of libraries - but now that ubuntu have gone from binutils 2.21.x to 2.22.x it has become more picky than normal. The attached patch fixes the above mentioned link-order problem for both xum1541 *and* xu1541 plugins. Reports on the cbm-hacker list indicates that xu1541 has the same problem ===== Quote OFF ===== You should be able to download the patch here: http://opencbm-user.22011.n6.nabble.com/opencbm-user-libusb-link-order-patch-td19.html Disclaimer: The fix works for xum1541 - but as I have no xu1541 cable - I have no way of verifying the fix for xu1541 - and hence I rely on your feedback and tests before any commit to opencbm is made - thanks in advance. Hope it works for you. /Uffe Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2012-05-28 02:00:04
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.