On Sun, May 13, 2012 at 04:52:06PM +0200, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: >http://www.zimmers.net/anonftp/pub/cbm/documents/chipdata/656x-luminances.gif That image was derived by Philip Timmermann from my measurements of the video signal with an oscilloscope: http://www.zimmers.net/anonftp/pub/cbm/documents/chipdata/656x-luminances.txt I used the same mainboard and exchanged video chips on it. I probably used something like POKE53280,x:POKE53281,x to change the colour. >It seems that the R3 displays colours noticeably brighter than R4 for >example (I remain at PAL only) although it seems to be better (more >uniformly) distributed in the higher range in R3, R4 seems to be doing >better in the lower (darker) range. Also seems to me, only by looking >at the picture in question, that R5 is a sort of compromise between R3 >and R4. Now, has anyone on the list a chance to test this in practice >and say (very subjectively of course) which "looks best in real life >applications"? Yes, you should have a chance, given that I gave you (or Ruud) my collection of VIC-II chips a couple of years ago. Marko Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2012-05-13 22:00:09
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.