Gerrit Heitsch wrote: > From what I read that chip (6562/63) was working, but needed rather > expensive SRAM since it used the 'no badline' approach of the original > VIC. Aha, it explains why the VIC-40 upgrade never really took place. I have Commodore brochures in four colour print where it says soon there would be a 40 column upgrade chip, and they didn't mean the software 40 column software. It actually shines a little more light on why the TED project lived on, assuming Commodore needed a cheaper alternative to the VIC-II for future entry level computers. Best regards Anders Carlsson Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2012-04-19 17:00:21
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.