On 4/11/2012 6:52 AM, email@example.com wrote: > Just to let you all know that I have a 'solution' to the 6702 issue and can run all of the V2 Waterloo Language software without > modifications to the original binary code or the 6809 emulator. There should be no reason why V1 Waterloo software should not run either. > > Rhialto has just added my 6702 code table into his development copy of VICE and has confirmed that it appears to work. > > The code is not a 100% simulation of the 6702 - but fakes the return data bytes in the same manner as a real chip would to satisfy the > checking subroutine. > > Regards, > > Dave > > Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list Before folks forget, can a document of inputs that the SW sends and expected responses from the unit be stored somewhere? Jim -- Jim Brain firstname.lastname@example.org www.jbrain.com Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2012-04-11 18:00:07
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.