RE: has anybody tried to replace a vic or vic II chip with a board containing a propeller ?

From: Didier Derny <didier_at_aida.org>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2012 20:42:14 +0100
Message-ID: <000001ccf4be$bda989b0$38fc9d10$@org>
I just forgot the sprites....

I checked the swinSID only the write are supported, R/W is not even
connected.
(I tried to emulate an eprom with an avr but I failed, even the "tightest"
assembler was 
Too slow. Perhaps that it could work with an xmega but the we have the 3v to
5v problem.)

--
Didier


-----Message d'origine-----
De : owner-cbm-hackers@musoftware.de
[mailto:owner-cbm-hackers@musoftware.de] De la part de Steve Gray
Envoyé : dimanche 26 février 2012 20:03
À : cbm-hackers@musoftware.de
Objet : Re: has anybody tried to replace a vic or vic II chip with a board
containing a propeller ?

In my opinion we need direct replacements for the various commodore chips so
we can keep the machines running. Particularly the rarer chips. The various
add-ons like the chameleon end up being bloated with features, besides
needing a working machine. If we had a drop-in replacement Vic-II with an
extra connector with VGA output we could just plug it in. The nano swinSID
is a great example of what can be done. It just drops in and it's relatively
inexpensive.

Steve


On Feb 26, 2012, at 11:57 AM, Ingo Korb <ml@akana.de> wrote:

> Luke Crook <luke@balooga.com> writes:
> 
>> Something like the Indivision ECS, but for the C64 would be great.
> 
> It's called "Turbo Chameleon 64"
> 
> -ik
> 
>       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Received on 2012-02-26 20:00:33

Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.