On Monday 19 September 2011, you wrote: > The Kryoflux hardware idea is fine. Software support tends to lag. It can't > read the back side of disks, for example. and it will never be able to =) although they claim something like that, you will have a very hard time to find a pc drive mech which can read tracks below track 4 on the flipside. you will require the same drive "hack" to read flip disks as you will need when working with the catweasel (which works by exactly the same principle) > For Commodore backups, I think the ZoomFloppy is better. Disclaimer: I > designed it but make no money from it. yes, definately. at the very least a 40 tracks/48tpi drive mech is needed (which is a bit hard to find for pc). and at the end you will probably find out that a good old 1541 still works better, especially for writing disks (which are then supposed to get read by a real 1541) Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2011-09-19 19:00:18
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.