Re: Signed multiplication

From: Ullrich von Bassewitz <*uz_at_musoftware.de*> Date: Mon, 16 Nov 2009 15:16:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20091116141620.GA1576@trixie.musoftware.de> · uz_at_musoftware.de

Hi Steve.

On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 11:09:17PM -0700, Steve Judd wrote:
> There is an article in C=Hacking which covers this.  Probably the big 3D
> article (issue 16?  memory is foggy).

Thanks for the explanation, I will check the article. I had already a short
email discussion with Konrad, who suggested the same method. And yes, I
believe that it can be implemented in less cycles than using negate. A minor
disadvantage is that it needs a few memory cells to keep the operands.

Regards

        Uz

-- 
Ullrich von Bassewitz                                  uz@musoftware.de

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list