Nate Lawson wrote: > There's quite a lot of SPI flash, although I don't see why he needs high > capacity or clock rate to support the replacement ROM application. > http://www.winbond-usa.com/en/content/view/290/553/ > > Flash is a pretty easy state machine and x8 parts mean you could > probably do it with 2 shift registers. I haven't thought of the > fewest-parts approach though. > Can you clarify your idea? I've seen SPI flash (and I2C flash), but I didn;t see a good way to interface that directly with the target system and a uC at the same time. Jim Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing listReceived on 2009-05-04 05:58:07
Archive generated by hypermail 2.2.0.