From: Rainer Buchty (rainer_at_buchty.net)
Date: 2008-12-05 11:11:04
On Thu, 4 Dec 2008, Jim Brain wrote: > I would concur. I tried compiling FatFS, which I feel is the best low > footprint FAT library out there, and it was 28K of 6502 code. I experimented with efsl (->32kB) and Larwe's DOSFS (->8kB). Thanks for the pointer to FatFS, so far I was looking into this one to be adopted: http://www.robs-projects.com/filelib.html > I would look to it as you code up ML, though, as I think the code is very > nice. I made a Long Filename variant of it called FatFS-LFN that we use in > uIEC and sd2iec. Not sure whether I need LFN (what a crude hack... I was amazed when I read the FAT-related documentation how it was fiddled into FAT) as the target architecture supports only 10-char filenames, hence mingling that into 8+3 should be fairly easy (apart from some non-standard symbols). Not sure, though, whether I'll be able to mingle everything (FAT32, SD/MMC access, system integration/menu) into the 4kB bank of the target machine's ROM. Thanks for the input from both of you! (Wolfram, you got mail ;) Rainer Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.