Re: Update IDEJD6

From: Rhialto (
Date: 2008-05-18 02:12:02

On Wed 16 Apr 2008 at 08:29:33 +0200, wrote:
> Very good question! And the next idea popped up. An IDE interface can
> handle two HD's: the master and a slave. Keep record of an extra
> BAM-alike table on the master that keeps track of sectors that have been
> written. During the time the drive is idle it can copy those changed
> sectors from the master to the slave HD. So at the end you should have
> two HD's in your system that are an exact copy of each other. And to
> save weight etc. it is not needed to keep the slave inside the system
> all the time; just plug it in once a week for the back-up.

That sounds a lot like the D1=0 command :-)

>    / /  |_/     Groetjes, Ruud
___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert      -- You author it, and I'll reader it.
\X/ rhialto/at/        -- Cetero censeo "authored" delendum esse.

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.