From: Rhialto (rhialto_at_falu.nl)
Date: 2008-05-18 02:12:02
On Wed 16 Apr 2008 at 08:29:33 +0200, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > Very good question! And the next idea popped up. An IDE interface can > handle two HD's: the master and a slave. Keep record of an extra > BAM-alike table on the master that keeps track of sectors that have been > written. During the time the drive is idle it can copy those changed > sectors from the master to the slave HD. So at the end you should have > two HD's in your system that are an exact copy of each other. And to > save weight etc. it is not needed to keep the slave inside the system > all the time; just plug it in once a week for the back-up. That sounds a lot like the D1=0 command :-) > / / |_/ Groetjes, Ruud -Olaf. -- ___ Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert -- You author it, and I'll reader it. \X/ rhialto/at/xs4all.nl -- Cetero censeo "authored" delendum esse. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.