Re: SpeedDOS
Date: 2007-02-16 12:44:55

On 2007-02-16, at 09:11, WhiteWolf wrote:

> Besides I'm interested in other parallel DOS versions too if it  
> doesn't require a deep hack in the drive (extra RAM, CPU or  
> others). And of course if it would better, faster than SpeedDOS  
> itself.

SpeedDOS represents more or less the "state of the art" when it comes  
to parallel speeders w/o "extra RAM, CPU or others". Of course there  
might be some differences among the implementations but - generally -  
the next big step in speed is to add track buffer (i.e. extra RAM) to  
the drive.

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.