Date: 2007-02-16 12:44:55
On 2007-02-16, at 09:11, WhiteWolf wrote: > Besides I'm interested in other parallel DOS versions too if it > doesn't require a deep hack in the drive (extra RAM, CPU or > others). And of course if it would better, faster than SpeedDOS > itself. SpeedDOS represents more or less the "state of the art" when it comes to parallel speeders w/o "extra RAM, CPU or others". Of course there might be some differences among the implementations but - generally - the next big step in speed is to add track buffer (i.e. extra RAM) to the drive. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.