Date: 2006-06-22 00:11:26
On 2006-06-18, at 17:22, Tim Schürmann wrote: >>>> has anyone successfully built opencbm 0.4.0 under recent 2.6.1x >>>> Linux >>>> kernel? >>> >>> Yes, on SuSE 10.0 with Kernel 2.6.13. >>> >>> Did you get an error message on your system? >> >> Yes, but I didn't have time to study the reasons. Wanted to know if >> it should compile at all first. Will come back to it then. Did you do >> anything special or it just compiled OOB? > > I just compiled it OOB, but there are maybe some pitfalls: > > If you get a message about missing sgmltools or something regarding > the > documents and/or if you get a message about an missing "mnib" > > then just ignore these messages. The docs and the additional tool > "mnib" > won't be build, but the rest is working as it should (these two parts > aren't neccesary). > > Another problem could be the compiler; but I didn't know which version > leads to a compiler error (Spiro?). AFAIR it was a problem during linking phase and ld has thrown the error message. Should be able to check it more thoroughly within a week or so, thanks. -- Democracy, n.: The triumph of popularity over principle. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.