Date: 2006-04-10 18:38:06
On 2006-04-10, at 09:19, Spiro Trikaliotis wrote: > BTW: You depend on $BA containing the number of the last accessed > drive. > If there was no access before, your routine fails. Yes. I also depend on it, whenever I can. I just hate hardcoded device numbers so popular still in 21st cent. > For example: OPEN (15,8,15) does absolutely nothing (but setting the > internal tables). (This is because no file name is given.) That's what I'd expect too. Still I get some strange results when $b7 is e.g. set or not set to 0. > Of course, both of your sample have one "problem": They depend upon > the > error channel sending a CR as last character. Although they do, > "theoretically", it would be clearer to wait until EOF is signalled. Hm, you seem to be very much right. Just have to check how IDE64 behaves with that one. -- If it wasn't for C, we would be stuck using BASI, PASAL and OBOL. Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.