Re: reading status channel in ML

From: Steve Judd (sjudd_at_ffd2.com)
Date: 2006-04-10 01:00:23

Next message: Spiro Trikaliotis: "Re: reading status channel in ML"
Previous message: Steve Judd: "Re: reading status channel in ML"
In reply to: Steve Judd: "Re: reading status channel in ML"
Next in thread: Spiro Trikaliotis: "Re: reading status channel in ML"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

On Sun, 9 Apr 2006, Steve Judd wrote:

> I think my basic rule has been to use CLOSE, followed by CLALL when
> finished.

Sorry, I meant CLRCHN not CLALL.  CLALL is best avoided altogether.

-S

       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Next message: Spiro Trikaliotis: "Re: reading status channel in ML"
Previous message: Steve Judd: "Re: reading status channel in ML"
In reply to: Steve Judd: "Re: reading status channel in ML"
Next in thread: Spiro Trikaliotis: "Re: reading status channel in ML"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.