From: Marko Mäkelä (marko.makela_at_hut.fi)
Date: 2005-10-10 09:07:16
On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 11:43:33PM +0200, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote: > I also remember seeing once a complete chart of rasterline numbers > for the 64 in both PAL and NTSC, which I also didn't find now but > this question is more easy as I am looking for info on the > differences in rasterlines numbering. Maybe you're looking for the VIC-Artikel (German) or VIC-Article (English) composed by Christian Bauer some ten years ago? It's based on measurements by Andreas Boose and me, among others. > Do both versions have the same numbering at the top (first raster part) > and differ only in the bottom part (when 9th bit kicks in)? If I remember correctly, the 6567R5 and R56A have 64*262 cycles and newer NTSC chips (6567R8 and later) have 65*263 cycles. I would assume that the 6566 (used in the VIC-10 aka Ultimax) is similar to the 6567R56A. All PAL chips should be 63*312 cycles. Has anyone seen a 6567R7 or a chip earlier than 6567R5? Or a 6569R2, for that matter? I've only come across to 6569R1, 6569R3, 6569R4 (rare) and 6569R5, and of course the newer HMOS chips. > Or are the lines also differently numbered in the upper part? Please check the VIC-Article. Marko Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.