Re: Data transfer methods

From: fachat (
Date: 2005-05-12 19:10:04

On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:39:58AM -0500, Jim Brain wrote:
> o We can debate the ugliness of FAT all day long, but it is the common 
> denominator.  Support for FAT (VFAT) is, in my opinion, a feature sorely 
> needed by CBM HW.

<shameless self-plug>FAT support has already been implemented
a number of times, including my GeckOS with FAT12, experimental
FAT16 and PC-type partition table support</shamless self-plug> :-)

Is there anyone who has done a VFAT filesystem with the long 


       Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list

Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.