From: fachat (afachat_at_gmx.de)
Date: 2005-05-12 19:10:04
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:39:58AM -0500, Jim Brain wrote:
> o We can debate the ugliness of FAT all day long, but it is the common
> denominator. Support for FAT (VFAT) is, in my opinion, a feature sorely
> needed by CBM HW.
<shameless self-plug>FAT support has already been implemented
a number of times, including my GeckOS with FAT12, experimental
FAT16 and PC-type partition table support</shamless self-plug> :-)
Is there anyone who has done a VFAT filesystem with the long
filenames?
Andre
Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.