From: fachat (afachat_at_gmx.de)
Date: 2005-05-12 19:10:04
On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 09:39:58AM -0500, Jim Brain wrote: > o We can debate the ugliness of FAT all day long, but it is the common > denominator. Support for FAT (VFAT) is, in my opinion, a feature sorely > needed by CBM HW. <shameless self-plug>FAT support has already been implemented a number of times, including my GeckOS with FAT12, experimental FAT16 and PC-type partition table support</shamless self-plug> :-) Is there anyone who has done a VFAT filesystem with the long filenames? Andre Message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list
Archive generated by hypermail pre-2.1.8.