Geoff Oltmans wrote: > I thought the "QD" format on 5.25" disks still used DD disks, only with > double the number of tracks (80 vs. 40)? Not exactly, real QD disks were tested and approved for that track density. I think they are physically the same as DD disks, but were more expensive. I have some disks here that say "96/100 tpi certified, two sided/double density", made by BASF. They run fine in a 8250 and SFD1001, but so do many DD disks. Nicolas - This message was sent through the cbm-hackers mailing list. To unsubscribe: echo unsubscribe | mail email@example.com.
Archive generated by hypermail 2.1.1.